🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents praising your insights on growing your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to explore opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous female professionals participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment this week after popular discussions indicated that changing their profile gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" language - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who use professional networking terminology.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which posts appear to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your content appears in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her reach decline substantially.

The Method

• First, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with similar "assertive" style

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Previously, my posts were softer - brief and clever, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, saying "Each day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some testers encountered positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" described a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a professional network and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where the same content by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and spread content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."